Difference between revisions of "Talk:Couch potato cache"
(answer question) |
(Glossary Entry or Stub Page?) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
See [[Glossary#C|the glossary entry]]. | See [[Glossary#C|the glossary entry]]. | ||
<br>- [[User:NiraD|niraD]] 19:34, 23 September 2008 (EDT) | <br>- [[User:NiraD|niraD]] 19:34, 23 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Glossary Entry or Stub Page? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I really think that short explanations like this belong in the Glossary, rather than in stub articles. But I now realize that when I moved the content from this article to the Glossary, I should have created a redirection to the Glossary rather than just deleting the page. Anyway, what should we do now? My inclination is to change this page to a redirection to the glossary. If anyone comes up with more to say about couch potato caches (enough to justify a separate article), then they could change the redirection back to an article. | ||
| + | <br>- [[User:NiraD|niraD]] 22:00, 2 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:00, 3 October 2008
What is a Couch potato cache? I have no clue. Maybe someone will edit this article.
- 98.224.219.156, 22 September 2008
See the glossary entry.
- niraD 19:34, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
[edit] Glossary Entry or Stub Page?
I really think that short explanations like this belong in the Glossary, rather than in stub articles. But I now realize that when I moved the content from this article to the Glossary, I should have created a redirection to the Glossary rather than just deleting the page. Anyway, what should we do now? My inclination is to change this page to a redirection to the glossary. If anyone comes up with more to say about couch potato caches (enough to justify a separate article), then they could change the redirection back to an article.
- niraD 22:00, 2 October 2008 (EDT)
