Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cacheopedia"
(removed Cache Sizes page) |
|||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == | + | == Redundant Information == |
| − | + | There's a fair bit of redundancy, for example: | |
| + | * [[Cache Containers]] | ||
| + | * [[Cache Sizes]] | ||
| + | * and perhaps even [[Microcache]], [[Nano cache]], etc. | ||
| − | + | Would it make sense have a single [[Cache Containers]] node, with [[Cache Sizes]] redirecting to it, and with the various sizes (micro, small, etc.) redirecting to it? | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | As a general example, it could be like this: [[Cache Containers#Micro Containers|Micro-cache]] | |
| − | + | (The target page isn't set up quite right yet in the above example, but it should show what I mean.) | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | --[[User:NiraD|niraD]] 14:02, 11 October 2006 (EDT) | |
| − | [[User: | + | |
| + | I removed the low-content [[Cache Sizes]] page and set it up to redirect to the [[Cache Containers]] page. I also updated the few links to the [[Cache Sizes]] page. But what about the various size-specific pages ([[Microcache]], [[Nano cache]], etc.)? | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:NiraD|niraD]] 17:37, 16 May 2011 (EDT) | ||
== Nice layout == | == Nice layout == | ||
Latest revision as of 21:37, 16 May 2011
[edit] Redundant Information
There's a fair bit of redundancy, for example:
- Cache Containers
- Cache Sizes
- and perhaps even Microcache, Nano cache, etc.
Would it make sense have a single Cache Containers node, with Cache Sizes redirecting to it, and with the various sizes (micro, small, etc.) redirecting to it?
As a general example, it could be like this: Micro-cache
(The target page isn't set up quite right yet in the above example, but it should show what I mean.)
--niraD 14:02, 11 October 2006 (EDT)
I removed the low-content Cache Sizes page and set it up to redirect to the Cache Containers page. I also updated the few links to the Cache Sizes page. But what about the various size-specific pages (Microcache, Nano cache, etc.)?
--niraD 17:37, 16 May 2011 (EDT)
[edit] Nice layout
It looks like the fundamental catagories have been determined, and I suspect that all other catagories will be sub-catagories of the ones on the Main Page. Using the 2x3 layout is a definite improvement. Huzzah!--S Keillan 17:06, 12 January 2006 (EST)
- Thanks. Nothing is set in stone though as far as main categories. I was really aiming for just showing some more content and cleaning up the front page.
- I want people who come to the front page to see that there is something already worth reading. Based on our logs, the main page is the highest exit page.
- --BigWhiteTruck 22:25, 12 January 2006 (EST)
Don't know if you guys know it or not, but there is another geocaching wiki - http://wiki.geocaching.com.au 61.88.61.66 23:50, 14 June 2006 (EDT) Cached, Australia
- I had seen that, too, but between the logo and the "Geocaching Australia" section on the front page, I was a bit foggy on how much its scope was intended to spread outside of Australia. ~~WestonWyse[ talk ]~~ 15:40, 19 June 2006 (EDT)
