Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cacheopedia"

From Cacheopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (spam question)
m (redundant information?)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Is there any way to delete the spam versions without also deleting the rest of the history?
 
Is there any way to delete the spam versions without also deleting the rest of the history?
 
Thanks.
 
  
 
--[[User:NiraD|niraD]] 19:28, 10 October 2006 (EDT)
 
--[[User:NiraD|niraD]] 19:28, 10 October 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Redundant Information ==
 +
 +
There's a fair bit of redundancy, for example:
 +
* [[Cache Containers]]
 +
* [[Cache Sizes]]
 +
* and perhaps even [[Microcache]], [[Nano caches]], etc.
 +
 +
Would it make sense have a single [[Cache Containers]] node, with [[Cache Sizes]] redirecting to it, and with the various sizes (micro, small, etc.) redirecting to it?
 +
 +
As a general example, it could be like this: [[Cache Containers#Micro Containers|Micro-cache]]
 +
 +
(The target page isn't set up quite right yet in the above example, but it should show what I mean.)
 +
 +
--[[User:NiraD|niraD]] 14:02, 11 October 2006 (EDT)
  
 
== Nice layout ==
 
== Nice layout ==

Revision as of 18:02, 11 October 2006

Spam

Before I had the ability to delete spam pages, I simply edited some spam pages to delete the spam and add real content. Logging Tips and Suggestions for good trade items are two examples.

Is there any way to delete the spam versions without also deleting the rest of the history?

--niraD 19:28, 10 October 2006 (EDT)

Redundant Information

There's a fair bit of redundancy, for example:

Would it make sense have a single Cache Containers node, with Cache Sizes redirecting to it, and with the various sizes (micro, small, etc.) redirecting to it?

As a general example, it could be like this: Micro-cache

(The target page isn't set up quite right yet in the above example, but it should show what I mean.)

--niraD 14:02, 11 October 2006 (EDT)

Nice layout

It looks like the fundamental catagories have been determined, and I suspect that all other catagories will be sub-catagories of the ones on the Main Page. Using the 2x3 layout is a definite improvement. Huzzah!--S Keillan 17:06, 12 January 2006 (EST)

Thanks. Nothing is set in stone though as far as main categories. I was really aiming for just showing some more content and cleaning up the front page.
I want people who come to the front page to see that there is something already worth reading. Based on our logs, the main page is the highest exit page.
--BigWhiteTruck 22:25, 12 January 2006 (EST)

Don't know if you guys know it or not, but there is another geocaching wiki - http://wiki.geocaching.com.au 61.88.61.66 23:50, 14 June 2006 (EDT) Cached, Australia

I had seen that, too, but between the logo and the "Geocaching Australia" section on the front page, I was a bit foggy on how much its scope was intended to spread outside of Australia. ~~WestonWyse[ talk ]~~ 15:40, 19 June 2006 (EDT)
Personal tools